Die Budget-Zwickmühle oder: Warum Skippy sterben muss

Howard Anderson ist kein Mann, der um den Brei herum redet: "You have a problem". Punkt. So beginnt er seinen Artikel in der InformationWeek über Budgetkürzungen und die notwendigen Selektionsprozesse dahinter, die ein CIO zu steuern hat.

Selektionsprozesse? Natürlich: Selektionsprozesse! Denn was wollen Sie zum Beispiel tun, wenn Ihre besten Leute ihre Energien in Projekte stecken, die zum Scheitern verurteilt sind? Wo sind die heiligen Kühe und wo die Gottheiten, die sie schützen? Manche Projekte sind wie alte Statuen im Park – von niemanden beachtet und nur mehr von den Tauben anvisiert. Sie merken: hier geht es nicht um Technologiefragen, hier geht es um Managementfragen.

Anderson ergänzt im O-Ton: "Some of these projects are "strategically important" but might not survive the bloodletting — is there a way you can hide them? Some of these projects have so much management attention that you dare not kill them, but they should mercifully be put out of their misery, either because they’re never going to work or the real cost is three times what anyone thought. Other projects made sense at the time but don’t now. Want to take that Big Write-off now? Not such a good time, is it?

Want to play company politics? Very risky. Ignore politics? More risky. This isn’t the time to bet your job. Think of the entire project pool as one large Dungeons & Dragons game."

Eine ausweglose Situation? Mitnichten! Howard’s Rules halten die Lösung bereit -messerscharf und mit einem Augenzwinkern. Hier ein Auszug:

1) Bündeln Sie Ihre Energien und finden Sie einen gemeinsamen Feind!

Maybe it’s the economy. Maybe your company is at a crossroads. But use the common enemy argument to kill the obvious losers. Kill any project where the return on investment — and you know how to fudge those numbers — is more than two years out. Kill projects where the resultant savings/benefit cuts over multiple cost centers. Kill projects whose justification is flimsy, like it will save everyone 6.3 minutes per week, which will never happen. Some projects are like statues in the park: They started with great hoopla but today no one quite remembers the subjects.

2) Schützen Sie Ihre besten Leute.

Move them into Safe Harbors, projects that can’t be killed, even if those projects aren’t quite as much fun or challenging. A great programmer is worth 10 average ones. A great project manager is the difference between "on time, on budget" and Excuse City. Yes, you may lose a few people, but you’ll live to fight another day.

3) Schützen Sie die Projekte, die vital sind für Ihr Unternehmen.

Protect the projects that keep the lights on and will carry you to a better day. There is always a tendency to let them slide and put off upgrades until "next year" — but next year may be worse.

4) Finden Sie Projekte, die Sie getrost Opfern können.

Find some projects to throw under the bus. You must show that you are a Team Player, so know what you want to kill and why. Smart CIOs will start to move their deadwood to those projects now, so that when they get killed, the people you would like to go will go with them.

5) Bringen Sie andere dazu, die Heiligen Kühe zu füttern.

Get the operating divisions to kick in some of their budget to the Sacred Cows. That will force them to choose.

6) Behalten Sie ein oder zwei Projekte, die wirklich sexy sind.

Keep one or two Knock Your Socks Off projects. You need to retain a little sex appeal to give hope to the superstars. Do as little as possible as loudly as possible.

7) Verabschieden Sie sich vom Gießkannenprinzip!

Realize that what you’re buying is Time. You just don’t have the budget you thought you did. Cutting each project by 15% doesn’t really do it if your budget is reduced by 15% — it should, but it doesn’t. Some projects must be cut to zero. And they must be cut right now.